CAPABILITY 05: CYCLE
The engine cycle deck, closed against constraints.
Genesis Ventures closes small-turbojet cycle solutions against declared constraints and delivers the engine cycle deck as a buildable artefact: the design point, the off-design operating points and the altitude × Mach tables, with rejected design points kept on the record. The Orion release is the published proof.

Scope
What an engagement in this capability covers, scoped against your mission profile at the requirements gate.
- Design-point selection against declared constraints: rejected points stay on the record
- Steady-state cycle closure: pressure ratio, turbine inlet temperature, mass flow and nozzle solution
- Off-design performance: engine cycle decks across altitude × Mach
- Thrust and fuel-burn tables evaluated for the flight model
Gas turbine cycle analysis starts from a frozen design point.
The design point couples the requirements that define one solved condition. For Orion, the published solution closes sea-level static net thrust at 13.34 kN, air mass flow at 16.65 kg/s, overall pressure ratio at 11.00 : 1 and turbine inlet temperature at 1320 K (1046.8 °C). The resulting TSFC is 99.3 kg/(kN·h). Each value belongs to the same solved condition.
The model basis is declared with the result. It uses Conservation of mass and energy, constant-property compressor and turbine isentropic-efficiency relations, a combustor fuel-energy balance, compressible mass-flow functions, choking at Mach 1, and momentum plus pressure thrust. The nozzle throat is solved at the design point and held fixed for altitude points; compressor-face Mach is then solved to satisfy that fixed capacity. This matters because a performance deck is only interpretable when the buyer can see what the model solved and what it held fixed.
A cycle engagement freezes the objective and constraints before the run. Pressure ratio, turbine inlet temperature, mass flow and nozzle capacity are then worked as one system. A candidate that meets thrust but misses the fuel target remains a miss. The release records that outcome against the original target.
Cycle selection keeps the rejected point in view.
The Orion trail begins with the supplied baseline at 4.2 : 1 overall pressure ratio and 1180 K turbine inlet temperature. It produced 12.35 kN at a TSFC of 125.3 kg/(kN·h). That line establishes the comparison basis before the redesign is judged.
The prescribed screening point raised pressure ratio to 8.5 : 1 at 1320 K. It closed at 13.25 kN and TSFC 105.0, so it missed the frozen TSFC target. The final selection moved to 11.0 : 1 at the same turbine inlet temperature, closing at 13.34 kN and TSFC 99.3. The losing point makes the selection legible.
For a buyer, that trail separates selection from assertion. It shows the supplied comparison, the candidate that failed and the point that passed. If the requirement changes, the record also shows which trade should be reopened and gives the next study a declared starting point.
Off-design engine cycle decks connect propulsion to flight.
A sea-level static point describes one condition. A flight mission needs solved anchors away from that design point. At 5 km / Mach 0.40, the model gives 7.93 kN thrust and TSFC 115.1 kg/(kN·h). At 10 km / Mach 0.70, it gives 5.01 kN and TSFC 123.7 kg/(kN·h). The nozzle is choked at every published point.
The same release supplies per-station total temperature, total pressure, Mach and mass flow. Those tables let a propulsion reviewer follow the gas path and give the airframe team engine-face conditions, fuel flow and thrust anchors in a form the flight model can consume.
The deliverable is the cycle deck with its assumptions, operating points and declared checks. Hardware behavior, installation losses and qualification evidence belong to later scopes with their own evidence.
Published Orion cycle point
These values are the public reference for the shape of a cycle-analysis release. A customer cycle is closed against its own frozen brief.
| MEASURE | VALUE | BASIS |
|---|---|---|
| Sea-level static net thrust | 13.34 kN | Uninstalled design point |
| TSFC | 99.3 kg/(kN·h) | Requirement ≤ 100 kg/(kN·h) |
| Overall pressure ratio | 11.00 : 1 | Selected cycle |
| Turbine inlet temperature | 1320 K (1046.8 °C) | Selected cycle |
| Nozzle throat area | 0.03965 m² | Fixed at design point |
What you get
Each gate ends with a customer-facing deliverable. The full five-gate sequence is on how we work.
- 01A closed design point: thrust, TSFC, OPR and mass flow, all verified
- 02An engine cycle deck: altitude × Mach tables for the flight model
- 03The screening trail, including every rejected design point
- 04Verification receipts: every figure checked against a declared threshold
Proof: Orion
- 13.34 kN sea-level static, TSFC 99.3 vs 125.3 baseline
- OPR 11.0:1 selected, the 8.5:1 point rejected on the record
- Deck anchors: 7.93 kN at 5 km/M0.40; 5.01 kN at 10 km/M0.70
Technical reading for this capability
Buyer guides and checklists tied to the same published evidence.
- Turbojet concept design deliverables
How to inspect a closed point, cycle trail, off-design deck and model basis.
- Compare small-turbojet design proposals
A buyer worksheet for normalizing conditions, TSFC basis and evidence.
- Small-turbojet design brief checklist
The mission inputs and constraints to freeze before cycle work starts.
A closed cycle model with declared checks.
Cycle analysis delivers a design point, a selection trail, solved operating points, station data and verification against the declared brief. The Orion figures are concept-model outputs with their conditions and requirements published. Installed performance and later engineering stages require their own scoped evidence.
Bring the mission profile.
Payload, envelope, timeline, constraints: one line is enough to begin. Common questions are answered on the FAQ.
[email protected]